Overall, Turner's argument emphasizes the need for a critical analysis of Orientalism and its implications for the study of Islam and capitalism. He further explores the relationship between Islam, capitalism, and the Weber theses, highlighting the continued dominance of Islam in politics and culture, both in the Orient and in Western society. Turner also critiques the role of classical orientalism and its influence on the concept of axial space, the politics of the text, and the construction of religion.

He challenges the assumptions of Orientalism and its impact on the study of Islam, arguing that it is important to understand the social structure of Islamic society and the impact of capitalism in the Middle East. What is main argument of bryan turner on Orientalism, Islam and Capitalism?Ĥ answers Bryan Turner's main argument on Orientalism, Islam, and Capitalism is that Orientalism, as a movement that emerged in the 18th century, has historically been associated with intellectual arrogance and the control and weakening of the East, particularly Islam.

Nietzsche's work also highlights the idea of reality as a social construction, emphasizing the role of beliefs, values, power, and interests in shaping social reality. Additionally, Nietzsche's social philosophy can contribute to social theory by critiquing popular ideals in social theory and considering the role of values and ideals in the constitution of sociological knowledge. Nietzsche's thought challenges the liberal concept of the individual and offers an alternative counter-concept of personhood and sovereignty, emphasizing the social and historical sources of the self. Another approach is to situate Nietzsche within the field of sociology and consider what his work offers to critical sociologists, Marxists, feminists, critical race theorists, and queer theorists. One approach is to explore Nietzsche's critical reflections on society and culture and their relevance to modern sociological theory, which has roots in thinkers like Kant, Comte, Marx, Engels, Durkheim, and Weber.

These criticisms highlight the need for alternative perspectives, such as conflict theory, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of social phenomena.Ĥ answers Nietzsche's work can be used in sociology by examining the connections between his ideas and sociological theory. On the other hand, the shortcomings of structural functionalism include its exclusive dependence on a structural-functional theory of social organization, which may limit the understanding of accounting regulation. Additionally, structural marxism tends to lean towards functionalism and teleology in explanation. This perspective raises theoretical problems such as the status of individuals as creative forces, the ontological status of structures, and the relationship between consciousness and structure. What are the ugly beliefs in Marxism and structural functionalism? 5 answers Marxism and structural functionalism have been criticized for their shortcomings and 'ugly beliefs.' Structural marxists have been criticized for treating reified entities like capital as the formal cause, while regarding individuals as mere carriers of a structural logic.

Structural functional theory criticism